Bug#805132: glx-alternative-nvidia:amd64 installs update-glx:armhf as dependency

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 16:51:22 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Do you have a backup of the dpkg status file from before > that upgrade? IIRC this should be sufficient to replay the upgrade path. > (/var/lib/dpkg/status) Sorry I forgot to reply. I don't have a backup of that file.

Bug#805132: glx-alternative-nvidia:amd64 installs update-glx:armhf as dependency

On 2015-11-15 15:18, Diederik de Haas wrote: > update-glx is indeed the only one in the whole list with ":armhf" appended to > its package name. Before reassigning it to apt/aptitude I'd prefer to have > found another package which exhibits the reported behavior. > Do you have any suggestions

Bug#805132: glx-alternative-nvidia:amd64 installs update-glx:armhf as dependency

On Sunday 15 November 2015 11:27:09 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > I haven't rebooted yet so I don't know if it will cause problems, but it > > does seem odd that on my amd64 a package from armhf is installed as > > dependency instead of the one from my 'native' architecture. > > That's weird, but

Bug#805132: glx-alternative-nvidia:amd64 installs update-glx:armhf as dependency

Control: tag -1 unreproducible On 2015-11-15 05:45, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Package: glx-alternative-nvidia > Version: 0.7.1 > Severity: normal > > I haven't rebooted yet so I don't know if it will cause problems, but it > does seem odd that on my amd64 a package from armhf is installed as >

Bug#805132: glx-alternative-nvidia:amd64 installs update-glx:armhf as dependency

Package: glx-alternative-nvidia Version: 0.7.1 Severity: normal I haven't rebooted yet so I don't know if it will cause problems, but it does seem odd that on my amd64 a package from armhf is installed as dependency instead of the one from my 'native' architecture. Probably a shortcoming of