On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > Actually some advice would be great, having had an initial look into
> > > this one now. Patch below shows the basic split we'll need to make
> > > the architecture independent packages generated separately, but I'm
> > > not sure how to fit that
- Original Message -
> > Actually some advice would be great, having had an initial look into
> > this one now. Patch below shows the basic split we'll need to make
> > the architecture independent packages generated separately, but I'm
> > not sure how to fit that split into the rest
> Actually some advice would be great, having had an initial look into
> this one now. Patch below shows the basic split we'll need to make
> the architecture independent packages generated separately, but I'm
> not sure how to fit that split into the rest of the rules file (I get
> the same sort
Tags: help
- Original Message -
> Greetings.
>
> I have the ok from the Release Managers to consider this issue as RC
> for stretch. I'm going to wait at least one week before raising
> this to "serious".
>
> If you need help to fix this bug, please tag it as "help".
Actually some
Hi Santiago,
- Original Message -
> Greetings.
>
> I have the ok from the Release Managers to consider this issue as RC
> for stretch. I'm going to wait at least one week before raising
> this to "serious".
>
> If you need help to fix this bug, please tag it as "help".
>
I have a
5 matches
Mail list logo
