Bug#806243: [libminc] Test issues when building on mipsel architecture (#66)

Control: severity -1 important On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 13:17:15 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:56:01 + James Cowgill > wrote: > > Since libminc has never successfully built on mipsel, this bug > > shouldn't have been serious in

Bug#806243: [libminc] Test issues when building on mipsel architecture (#66)

Control: block 800414 with -1 . On Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:56:01 + James Cowgill wrote: > Since libminc has never successfully built on mipsel, this bug > shouldn't have been serious in the first place (regardless of what was > causing it). But the minc package (before

Bug#806243: [libminc] Test issues when building on mipsel architecture (#66)

Hi, I'm just forwarding this mail from upstream. From my perspective it is possibly not a bug in libminc but rather a problem of certain mips hardware. I wonder in how far this is a serious bug of libminc and should be downgraded to important (at maximum). Kind regards Andreas. On

Bug#806243: [libminc] Test issues when building on mipsel architecture (#66)

On Sat, 2015-12-05 at 18:21 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just forwarding this mail from upstream.  From my perspective it is > possibly not a bug in libminc but rather a problem of certain mips > hardware.  I haven't looked at this build failure in particular, but I do know the FPUs