Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi People, i'm back (sorry i very busy with work/study) =| On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 11:35:05 +0200 Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Bart Martens already changed the metadata of #693230 to match your > intentions. very good, thanks! > > The next step for you would be to seek a sponsor to review and

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

[ dropping #806572 as that bug is closed and archived ] Hi, On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 01:47:37PM -0300, Fernando Toledo wrote: > https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multimail > > I upload to mentors: > https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail > > I see that the package is orphaned, i can adopt

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi people! I'm working on version 0.52 https://github.com/ftoledo/pkg-multimail I upload to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/multimail I see that the package is orphaned, i can adopt it, but i'm not DD, how to can i help and procced to upload to unstable? Thanks! -- Fernando

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Sun, 15 May 2016 15:13:34 + Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Hi Robert! > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:52:07PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > >I'm afraid that I got rather heavily tied up in other things and so > > haven't > > been able to work on this as much as I'd

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Robert! On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:52:07PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: >I'm afraid that I got rather heavily tied up in other things and so > haven't > been able to work on this as much as I'd like... Should I perhaps > temporarily > close the RFS bug and reopen it when I have an

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:52:07PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: >I'm afraid that I got rather heavily tied up in other things and so > haven't > been able to work on this as much as I'd like... life sometimes gets in the middle of this, yeah... > Should I perhaps temporarily > close

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Mattia! On Wednesday, March 02, 2016 01:16:20 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:38:47AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > > Hi Tobias! > > > > On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Robert! On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:38:47AM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote: > Hi Tobias! > > On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay > > wrote: > > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM

Bug#693230: Fwd: Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Forward to ITP bug... -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA] Date: Tuesday, January 05, 2016, 06:08:55 PM From: Robert James Clay <j...@rocasa.us> To: debian-ment...@lists.debian.org, Tobias Frost <t...@debian.o

Bug#693230: Fwd: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA] Date: Thursday, January 07, 2016, 05:54:29 AM From: Tobias Frost <t...@frost.de> To: 806...@bugs.debian.org Hi Robert, (btw, please configure your MTA to wrap your mails) On Tue, 05 Ja

Bug#693230: Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Tobias! On Thursday, January 07, 2016 05:54:29 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay > wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream? > > > >The non vendor

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

PS: Another remark regarding bluewave.h -- I did not evaluate if this license is compatible with the GPL-3.. Another thing to check with debian-legal. Hi Robert, (btw, please configure your MTA to wrap your mails) On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay wrote: >

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Robert, (btw, please configure your MTA to wrap your mails) On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 18:08:55 -0500 Robert James Clay wrote: > On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > - Is the patch forwarded to upstream? >  >The non vendor specific parts of it, you

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: > > Some small review. As a result of the review of my multimail package by Tobias, I have completed some updates to the package and have uploaded the new

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: Some small review. (I did not perform a copyright check and did not build the package) - Please do not introduce a dbg package -- they are now automatically generated. (The long description would be anyway confusing: "provides

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: > > Some small review. Thanks! > > - Please do not introduce a dbg package -- they are now automatically > generated. That came out since my

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

El 03/01/16 a las 11:44, Robert James Clay escribió: > On Sunday, November 29, 2015 02:25:05 AM Robert James Clay wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multimail" > >I am still looking for a sponsor for the package I am adopting, > "multimail"; or at least a review(s), if

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Hi Fernando! On Monday, January 04, 2016 02:56:45 PM Fernando Toledo wrote: > > El 03/01/16 a las 11:44, Robert James Clay escribió: > >I am still looking for a sponsor for the package I am adopting, > > "multimail"; or at least a review(s), if not sponsoring. > Hi Robert, i just

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

On Sunday, November 29, 2015 02:25:05 AM Robert James Clay wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multimail" I am still looking for a sponsor for the package I am adopting, "multimail"; or at least a review(s), if not sponsoring. It can be downloaded as follows: dget -x

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "multimail" * Package name: multimail Version : 0.50~20150922-1 Upstream Author : William McBrine * URL : http://multimail.sourceforge.net *