Hi,
Hendrik Brueckner (2015-12-16):
> It's fine to defer them to a follw-up release. I have continued to
> work on the multipath stuff and I will provide a summary of what I
> think needs to be integrated. Briefly, there are some additional
> changes on top of
Hi Cyril!
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:06:01AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (2015-12-02):
> > > Mathieu mentioned branches a while ago:
> > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2015/05/msg00271.html
> > >
> > >
> > That's spot on, it's exactly
Hi,
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (2015-12-02):
> > Mathieu mentioned branches a while ago:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2015/05/msg00271.html
> >
> >
> That's spot on, it's exactly what is needed in partman-multipath.
OK.
> Still, shouldn't we also copy over the
Package: partman-multipath
Version: 4
Severity: important
Tags: d-i patch
Dear Maintainers,
the partman-multipath installer modules does not detect multipath devices
because the multipath alias names have been changed. Also the location of
the bindings file has been changed and, therefore,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
> > Below you can find a patch that solves both problems. Feedback is
> welcome.
>
> Mathieu mentioned branches a while ago:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2015/05/msg00271.html
>
>
That's spot
Hi,
Hendrik Brueckner (2015-12-02):
> Package: partman-multipath
> Version: 4
> Severity: important
> Tags: d-i patch
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> the partman-multipath installer modules does not detect multipath devices
> because the multipath alias names have been
6 matches
Mail list logo