Control: reassign -1 hurd
Control: close -1 1:0.9.git20180108-1
Samuel Thibault, le mar. 15 déc. 2015 01:13:24 +0100, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault, on Tue 15 Dec 2015 00:53:48 +0100, wrote:
> > Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote:
> > > I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2015, 01:13 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Samuel Thibault, on Tue 15 Dec 2015 00:53:48 +0100, wrote:
> > Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote:
> > > I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism the build system ensures
> > > that these are found, but
Samuel Thibault, on Tue 15 Dec 2015 00:53:48 +0100, wrote:
> Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote:
> > I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism the build system ensures
> > that these are found, but I’d bet on rpath. Does hurd handle rpaths
> > differently?
>
> It does support
Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote:
> I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism the build system ensures
> that these are found, but I’d bet on rpath. Does hurd handle rpaths
> differently?
It does support rpath. ghc apparently uses $ORIGIN in rpath. IIRC we
added some supp
Hi,
Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 16:26 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 15:50:27 +0100, wrote:
> > Maybe the haddock executable is broken on hurd? What happens if you
> > install ghc and run haddock --interface-version?
>
> I get 27
ah, looking at the build log
Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 15:50:27 +0100, wrote:
> Maybe the haddock executable is broken on hurd? What happens if you install
> ghc and run haddock --interface-version?
I get 27
Samuel
Hi,
Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 15:24 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Source: ghc
> Version: 7.10.3-4
> Severity: important
>
> On the hurd-i386 port, the ghc package has
>
> Provides: ghc-dynamic, ghc-ghci, ghc-haddock, haddock,
> haddock-interface-, etc.
>
> while on other ports, it provides
Source: ghc
Version: 7.10.3-4
Severity: important
On the hurd-i386 port, the ghc package has
Provides: ghc-dynamic, ghc-ghci, ghc-haddock, haddock,
haddock-interface-, etc.
while on other ports, it provides haddock-interface-27. I don't know
how this is supposed to be computed, but it seems tha
8 matches
Mail list logo