Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

Hi Iain! Thanks for reviewing and considering to sponsor pkgdiff. I changed 2.0 to 2. The ".0" is appended automatically if you use dh_make for an initial template. Should I report a bug about this to devscripts? I reuploaded it to mentors and also pushed the changes to git. Thanks again Peter

Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

Hi, On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 11:04:05AM +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > Thanks for reviewing and considering to sponsor pkgdiff. > I changed 2.0 to 2. The ".0" is appended automatically if you use > dh_make for an initial template. Should I report a bug about this > to devscripts? I think this

Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

On 25 December 2015 at 11:04, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > Thanks for reviewing and considering to sponsor pkgdiff. > I changed 2.0 to 2. The ".0" is appended automatically if you use > dh_make for an initial template. Should I report a bug about this > to devscripts? It is

Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

> > It is not actually a bug to specify GPL-2.0, as both GPL-2 and GPL-2.0 > are acceptable. I'd say otherwise, scripts Ian mentioned that do not > support GPL-2.0 are buggy, and the format specification requires the > dot-zero version number to be accepted as well. > Thanks for the

Bug#808723: RFS pkgdiff

Hi, This package is not yet ready for upload, but it's almost there. In debian/copyright, please change GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ to just GPL-2 and GPL-2+ so that utilities that scan these files for these shortnames will pick them up. Once you've made that change, I would be happy to sponsor the

Bug#808723: RFS: pkgdiff/1.7.1-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pkgdiff". It is an alternative version of diffoscope and is a required depndency for abi-tracker [1], which I plan to bring to Debian. * Package name: pkgdiff Version :