Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

2016-05-16 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 08:51:11PM +0200, Ben Wiederhake wrote: > > Is anything happening here? > > Months passed since last email. > > In short: no, nothing to see here. > > If anyone is willing to work on libtgl's (the vysheng fork) missing API for > channels (which is the main thing holding

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

2016-05-16 Thread Ben Wiederhake
It *is* backward-compatible, but now a freshly-introduced turns-out-to-be-big feature is missing. Here I was referencing the "new" channels and super-groups, which still aren't implemented in telegram-purple, because Matthias hasn't had enough time for that yet (and I don't have any time at

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

2016-05-15 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:18:28PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > >It *is* backward-compatible, but now a freshly-introduced > >turns-out-to-be-big feature is missing. > > > let me know if you can do your upstream features in time, and I'll try to > quickly make the package >

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

2016-02-29 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >It *is* backward-compatible, but now a freshly-introduced >turns-out-to-be-big feature is missing. let me know if you can do your upstream features in time, and I'll try to quickly make the package uploaded on unstable then :) cheers, G.

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

2016-02-29 Thread Ben Wiederhake
Hey there, Well, that didn't work. Also, see below. As it turns out, pushing 1.2.5 into Debian right now would be a bad idea. again, if the problem is on Windows, I don't really care. We're not entirely sure about that; and 1.3.0 isn't ready yet. Due to Telegram cranking out unexpected

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

2016-02-29 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, > sorry for the long wait, real life happened. Also, note the version bump > in the subject from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5. no problem :) > We now bundle the origtar, and listen for it in d/watch wonderful! > I would like to see this work helping all Debian-derivatives. > A month ago, before I went

Bug#809623: RFS: telegram-purple/1.2.5

2016-02-20 Thread BenWiederhake.GitHub
Hello, sorry for the long wait, real life happened. Also, note the version bump in the subject from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5. Seems like it, true, but sadly is necessary. The package is in version control, and unless we provide pre-bundled origtars somewhere (which won't happen), this has to build the