On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 08:51:11PM +0200, Ben Wiederhake wrote:
> > Is anything happening here?
> > Months passed since last email.
>
> In short: no, nothing to see here.
>
> If anyone is willing to work on libtgl's (the vysheng fork) missing API for
> channels (which is the main thing holding
It *is* backward-compatible, but now a freshly-introduced
turns-out-to-be-big feature is missing.
Here I was referencing the "new" channels and super-groups, which still
aren't implemented in telegram-purple, because Matthias hasn't had
enough time for that yet (and I don't have any time at
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 08:18:28PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >It *is* backward-compatible, but now a freshly-introduced
> >turns-out-to-be-big feature is missing.
>
>
> let me know if you can do your upstream features in time, and I'll try to
> quickly make the package
>
Hi,
>It *is* backward-compatible, but now a freshly-introduced
>turns-out-to-be-big feature is missing.
let me know if you can do your upstream features in time, and I'll try to
quickly make the package
uploaded on unstable then :)
cheers,
G.
Hey there,
Well, that didn't work. Also, see below. As it turns out, pushing 1.2.5
into Debian right now would be a bad idea.
again, if the problem is on Windows, I don't really care.
We're not entirely sure about that; and 1.3.0 isn't ready yet.
Due to Telegram cranking out unexpected
Hi,
> sorry for the long wait, real life happened. Also, note the version bump
> in the subject from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5.
no problem :)
> We now bundle the origtar, and listen for it in d/watch
wonderful!
> I would like to see this work helping all Debian-derivatives.
> A month ago, before I went
Hello,
sorry for the long wait, real life happened. Also, note the version bump
in the subject from 1.2.3 to 1.2.5.
Seems like it, true, but sadly is necessary. The package is in version
control, and unless we provide pre-bundled origtars somewhere (which
won't happen), this has to build the
7 matches
Mail list logo