On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 21:07, Craig Small wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 06:09, Mark Hindley wrote:
>>
>> IIUC, the proposal[1] was to create a new Essential procps-base just
>> containing
>> pidof. Otherwise bin:procps would have to become Essential itself. Its
>> installed
>> size is
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 06:09, Mark Hindley wrote:
> IIUC, the proposal[1] was to create a new Essential procps-base just
> containing
> pidof. Otherwise bin:procps would have to become Essential itself. Its
> installed
> size is about 20 times larger than sysvinit-util and that wouldn't
>
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 19:14, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> Craig,
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 08:08:37PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> > I'll need the assistance of the sysvinit-utils maintainers (CC'ed) as
> >well, as pidof will be moving from that package.
>
> IIUC, the
Craig,
Thanks for this.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 08:08:37PM +1100, Craig Small wrote:
> I'll need the assistance of the sysvinit-utils maintainers (CC'ed) as
>well, as pidof will be moving from that package.
IIUC, the proposal[1] was to create a new Essential procps-base just containing
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 09:17, Craig Small wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 at 23:45, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>>
>> Now that Bookworm has shipped, what about finally finishing this and
>> getting rid of this debianism? There is really no reason to delay it
>> any longer at this point. Thank you!
>
>
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 at 23:45, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Now that Bookworm has shipped, what about finally finishing this and
> getting rid of this debianism? There is really no reason to delay it
> any longer at this point. Thank you!
>
Hi Luca,
I'll need the assistance of the sysvinit-utils
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:07:21 -0700 Josh Triplett
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:01:14PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:34:58AM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > > Craig,
> > >
> > > Thanks for this.
> > >
> > > This dates from before my detailed involvement
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 02:01:14PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:34:58AM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > Craig,
> >
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> > This dates from before my detailed involvement with this area of Debian. I
> > have
> > read through the bug report,
Hello Mark, Craig,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:34:58AM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Craig,
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> This dates from before my detailed involvement with this area of Debian. I
> have
> read through the bug report, but apologies if I have missed pertinent detail.
[]
> 3) A
Craig,
Thanks for this.
This dates from before my detailed involvement with this area of Debian. I have
read through the bug report, but apologies if I have missed pertinent detail.
I am happy to work with you to achieve this if it is really worthwhile and time
well spent. However, I am yet to
Hello,
You may recall quite some time ago there was this bug #810018 where it was
asked can procps ship pidof so that sysvinit-utils could have its Essential
flag removed.
That was.. back in 2016. Is this still something that would be useful to
be done?
Michael put some good work in looking
11 matches
Mail list logo
