Hi,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 09:24:02PM -0500, anarcat wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:19:42AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On lun., 2016-04-25 at 05:45 +, Amarildo Júnior wrote:
> > > Any news?
> >
> > Stay tuned? As already said I was waiting on the kernel to become eligible
> >
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:19:42AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On lun., 2016-04-25 at 05:45 +, Amarildo Júnior wrote:
> > Any news?
>
> Stay tuned? As already said I was waiting on the kernel to become eligible for
> migration. This happened two days ago, so I'll prepare a
>But you're not forced to stop breathing in the meantime.
Correct. I'll be using the Kernel from your repo in the mean time. I think
all the other packages are already in Jessie, e.g. attr, pax-utils, paxctl,
checksecurity, paxtest.
On lun., 2016-04-25 at 05:45 +, Amarildo Júnior wrote:
> Any news?
Stay tuned? As already said I was waiting on the kernel to become eligible for
migration. This happened two days ago, so I'll prepare a jessie-backport
upload. But you're not forced to stop breathing in the meantime.
Regards,
Any news?
On dim., 2016-04-17 at 11:21 +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > With that in mind, what's the status on this? I didn't take the above mail
> as
> > an ACK for for upload to jessie-backport, but maybe it was actually one?
> It was an ACK.
Thanks!
>
> > I've uploaded a new kernel to sid just
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2016-03-22 at 13:30 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2016-03-22 at 13:22 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > >
> > > You - or better more than one person - promise to support this kernel for
> > > at least stable and (later)
On mar., 2016-03-22 at 13:30 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2016-03-22 at 13:22 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >
> > You - or better more than one person - promise to support this kernel for
> > at least stable and (later) oldstable. Preferably later jessie-lts.
> > Supporting means
On mar., 2016-03-22 at 13:22 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> You - or better more than one person - promise to support this kernel for
> at least stable and (later) oldstable. Preferably later jessie-lts.
> Supporting means the usual thing frequent uploads and so on.
Yes, I do intend to keep it
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hi,
> On mar., 2016-03-22 at 11:57 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > It won't be in testing if it's not suitable for stable. That would
> > > defeat the purpose of testing.
> > Then it defeats the
[adding the bug on CC so it gets archived there too]
On mar., 2016-03-22 at 11:57 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > It won't be in testing if it's not suitable for stable. That would
> > defeat the purpose of testing.
> Then it defeats the purpose of
11 matches
Mail list logo
