Bug#812110: KeePassX 0.4 and KeePassX 2.0 should be in different packages

2019-05-06 Thread marjan cinober
Hi guys I was irritated by this name collision for long time until I finally did something about it. Here is my solution. Hope somebody with upload privileges will publish it for everybody. Run the attached script ant it will download latest release, patch it to a new name keepassx1, build it and

Bug#812110: KeePassX 0.4 and KeePassX 2.0 should be in different packages

2016-02-04 Thread Evgeny Kapun
On 05.02.2016 00:13, Felix Geyer wrote: On 20.01.2016 19:53, Evgeny Kapun wrote: I think most tools support the .kdbx format by now so shipping just one version seems like the right choice to me. The problem is that if the same database is used on multiple machines, they must be all upgraded

Bug#812110: KeePassX 0.4 and KeePassX 2.0 should be in different packages

2016-01-20 Thread Felix Geyer
Hi, On 20.01.2016 17:40, Evgeny Kapun wrote: > Package: keepassx > > KeePassX 2.0, the new upstream version, stores password databases in a format > incompatible with > KeePassX 0.4. As a result, some users may prefer to keep the old version for > interoperability. > However, because Debian pac

Bug#812110: KeePassX 0.4 and KeePassX 2.0 should be in different packages

2016-01-20 Thread Evgeny Kapun
Package: keepassx KeePassX 2.0, the new upstream version, stores password databases in a format incompatible with KeePassX 0.4. As a result, some users may prefer to keep the old version for interoperability. However, because Debian package for KeePassX 2.0 uses the same name as KeePassX 0.4,