Bug#815407: xd: FTBFS on hurd-i386: error: 'PATH_MAX' was not declared in this scope

2016-02-21 Thread Frank B. Brokken
Dear Andreas Beckmann, you wrote: > > On 2016-02-21 12:30, Frank B. Brokken wrote: > > It should be trivially fixable: should be a matter of including > > in alternatives/alternatives.ih. (*should* because I don't > > Does that header exist on hurd-i386? Don't know, but the problem has been

Bug#815407: xd: FTBFS on hurd-i386: error: 'PATH_MAX' was not declared in this scope

2016-02-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2016-02-21 12:30, Frank B. Brokken wrote: > It should be trivially fixable: should be a matter of including > in alternatives/alternatives.ih. (*should* because I don't Does that header exist on hurd-i386? Probably ask the hurd porters for advice how to fix this recurring problem. Andreas

Bug#815407: xd: FTBFS on hurd-i386: error: 'PATH_MAX' was not declared in this scope

2016-02-21 Thread Frank B. Brokken
Dear Andreas Beckmann, you wrote: > If this isn't trivially fixable, please request the outdated binary > packages to be decrufted. It should be trivially fixable: should be a matter of including in alternatives/alternatives.ih. (*should* because I don't have access to a hurd machine, so I

Bug#815407: xd: FTBFS on hurd-i386: error: 'PATH_MAX' was not declared in this scope

2016-02-21 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: xd Version: 3.23.04-1 Severity: important Hi, xd currently FTBFS on hurd-i386 (but an older version built successfully on that platform): https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=xd=hurd-i386=3.23.04-1=1450674516 [...] g++ -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat