Bug#815712: ilmbase: FPU functions unimplemented on kfreebsd/hurd

2016-02-23 Thread Steven Chamberlain
tags 815712 + patch thanks Hi Mathieu! Would you like to try my patches (attached) to fix the testsuite on 32-bit x86? Possibly some other 32-bit systems will need to be listed, although ARM seemed to be unaffected so far. Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org Subject:

Bug#815712: ilmbase: FPU functions unimplemented on kfreebsd/hurd

2016-02-23 Thread Steven Chamberlain
forwarded 815712 https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/openexr-devel/2015-12/msg0.html thanks also: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/2015-11/msg00179.html It seems like these large errors are to be expected on most 32-bit arches. Upstream didn't suggest how to fix it, but I'm

Bug#815712: ilmbase: FPU functions unimplemented on kfreebsd/hurd

2016-02-23 Thread Steven Chamberlain
The next test failure is a bit more tricky to understand: | ImathTest: testBox.cpp:286: void {anonymous}::testExtendByPoint(const char*) [with T = Imath_2_2::Vec2]: Assertion `b.min == min && b.max == max' failed. | [...] | b = {min = {x = -7524.7915, y = }, max = {x = -7524.7915, y =

Bug#815712: ilmbase: FPU functions unimplemented on kfreebsd/hurd

2016-02-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Steven Chamberlain, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 22:32:35 +, wrote: > assert (approximatelyEqual (b3.max, b4.max, e)); > assert (approximatelyEqual (b3.max, b4.max, e)); This looks odd btw, one should be max and the other min. Samuel

Bug#815712: ilmbase: FPU functions unimplemented on kfreebsd/hurd

2016-02-23 Thread Steven Chamberlain
(let's continue this as Bug#815712 instead) Steven Chamberlain wrote: > [...] I'm not sure how that could have regressed since > the -8 package... I wonder if it has to do with the patch that was > only meant to disable the FPU features on hurd and kfreebsd. I'm fairly sure Samuel's patch