On 04/07/16 22:59, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Ping?
Sorry for the delay. I have just uploaded this. The workaround works, so let's
use that as we don't have a better solution.
Cheers,
Emilio
Hello,
Ping?
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 17:48:05 +0100, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 17:20:19 +0100, wrote:
> > Michael Biebl, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 03:05:55 +0100, wrote:
> > > Related to that, the generated shlibs file for libgail8 has
> > >
> > > > libgailutil 1
Hello,
Ping?
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 17:48:05 +0100, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 17:20:19 +0100, wrote:
> > Michael Biebl, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 03:05:55 +0100, wrote:
> > > Related to that, the generated shlibs file for libgail8 has
> > >
> > > > libgailutil 1
Samuel Thibault, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 17:20:19 +0100, wrote:
> Michael Biebl, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 03:05:55 +0100, wrote:
> > Related to that, the generated shlibs file for libgail8 has
> >
> > > libgailutil 18 libgail18 (>= 2.24.0), libgail-common (>= 2.24.0)
> > > udeb: libgailutil 18 libgail18-ude
Hello,
Michael Biebl, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 03:05:55 +0100, wrote:
> Related to that, the generated shlibs file for libgail8 has
>
> > libgailutil 18 libgail18 (>= 2.24.0), libgail-common (>= 2.24.0)
> > udeb: libgailutil 18 libgail18-udeb (>= 2.24.0), libgail-common (>= 2.24.0)
>
> The udeb line
Hello,
Michael Biebl, on Sun 20 Mar 2016 02:38:09 +0100, wrote:
> Am 16.03.2016 um 15:03 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> > Samuel Thibault, on Mon 07 Mar 2016 03:07:29 +0100, wrote:
> >> Samuel Thibault, on Fri 04 Mar 2016 13:56:08 +0100, wrote:
> >>> Ok, I'll be testing the attached patch.
> >>
> >> Y
Am 20.03.2016 um 02:38 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 16.03.2016 um 15:03 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
>> Hello gtk maintainers,
>>
>> Samuel Thibault, on Mon 07 Mar 2016 03:07:29 +0100, wrote:
>>> Samuel Thibault, on Fri 04 Mar 2016 13:56:08 +0100, wrote:
Ok, I'll be testing the attached patch.
>>>
Am 16.03.2016 um 15:03 schrieb Samuel Thibault:
> Hello gtk maintainers,
>
> Samuel Thibault, on Mon 07 Mar 2016 03:07:29 +0100, wrote:
>> Samuel Thibault, on Fri 04 Mar 2016 13:56:08 +0100, wrote:
>>> Ok, I'll be testing the attached patch.
>>
>> Yes, it is working, could that be applied to gtk+2
Hello gtk maintainers,
Samuel Thibault, on Mon 07 Mar 2016 03:07:29 +0100, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Fri 04 Mar 2016 13:56:08 +0100, wrote:
> > Ok, I'll be testing the attached patch.
>
> Yes, it is working, could that be applied to gtk+2.0?
Ping?
FTR: we need libgail-common-udeb and libatk-
Control: tags -1 + tag
Samuel Thibault, on Fri 04 Mar 2016 13:56:08 +0100, wrote:
> Cyril Brulebois, on Fri 04 Mar 2016 02:50:28 +0100, wrote:
> > gtk+3 isn't happening right now, due to (unanswered):
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2016/01/msg00226.html
>
> Ok, I'll be testing the att
10 matches
Mail list logo
