On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:14:57PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > - https://wiki.debian.org/RepositoryFormat#Acquire-By-Hash
>
> I think this should say that clients must fall back to the canonical
> locations if by-hash fails, not that they may fall back. Mirrors
> (particularly partial ones)
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:33:13PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> ==> https://wiki.debian.org/RepositoryFormat
Thanks for writing this. A couple of comments:
> - https://wiki.debian.org/RepositoryFormat#Acquire-By-Hash
I think this should say that clients must fall back to the canonical
Hi,
(never tried sending a mail to two bugs while closing one of them…
lets see how that goes – and sorry already for all the breakage caused)
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Please provide a spec of what apt expects from the archive so our friendly
> ftpteam
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 03:33:12PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> apt supports content-addressed metadata files (Translations, Packages,
> Sources, ..).
>
> With this feature, we can have significantly more robust Debian mirrors.
>
> Please provide a spec of what apt expects from the archive
Package: apt
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
apt supports content-addressed metadata files (Translations, Packages, Sources,
..).
With this feature, we can have significantly more robust Debian mirrors.
Please provide a spec of what apt expects from the
5 matches
Mail list logo
