On 2016-03-14 20:09, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 20:01:44 +0100, wrote:
> > While this is definitely a bug, the leakage happens only once per
> > nameserver and per program, and doesn't increase with the number of
> > calls to getaddrinfo. Moreover it is actually
Aurelien Jarno, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 20:01:44 +0100, wrote:
> While this is definitely a bug, the leakage happens only once per
> nameserver and per program, and doesn't increase with the number of
> calls to getaddrinfo. Moreover it is actually useful to keep this
> information up to the end of the
control: tag -1 + confirmed
control: severity -1 minor
On 2016-03-14 15:54, Tim Ruehsen wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> getaddrinfo/freeaddrinfo seems to have a memory leak.
>
> Testcode:
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
>
Package: libc6
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
getaddrinfo/freeaddrinfo seems to have a memory leak.
Testcode:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(void)
{
struct addrinfo *addrinfo, hints;
memset(, 0 ,sizeof(hints));
hints.ai_family =
4 matches
Mail list logo