Bug#818997: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#818997: gpgv.exe linked dynamically against zlib1, doesn't allow proper signature verification

2016-04-09 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2016-04-05 02:23:59 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > gpgv-win32 from unstable seems to work for me now (using the > debian/tests/gpgv-win32 test at least). good! > The CI test still fails though, you might want to try integrating > Antonio's proposal below. it should already

Bug#818997: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#818997: gpgv.exe linked dynamically against zlib1, doesn't allow proper signature verification

2016-04-05 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi Daniel, gpgv-win32 from unstable seems to work for me now (using the debian/tests/gpgv-win32 test at least). The CI test still fails though, you might want to try integrating Antonio's proposal below. Le jeudi, 24 mars 2016, 14.41:54 Antonio Terceiro a écrit : > the caveat in this case is

Bug#818997: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#818997: gpgv.exe linked dynamically against zlib1, doesn't allow proper signature verification

2016-03-24 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:07:01PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le mercredi, 23 mars 2016, 23.14:59 Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit : > > On Tue 2016-03-22 12:49:10 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > > (By the way, the CI seems to have never run successfully in the last > > > months:

Bug#818997: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#818997: gpgv.exe linked dynamically against zlib1, doesn't allow proper signature verification

2016-03-24 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mercredi, 23 mars 2016, 23.14:59 Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit : > On Tue 2016-03-22 12:49:10 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > I've noticed that gpgv.exe fails its CI test > > (debian/tests/gpgv-win32) in version 1.4.20-4 (-3 and previous work > > fine): > > interesting, there was no

Bug#818997: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#818997: gpgv.exe linked dynamically against zlib1, doesn't allow proper signature verification

2016-03-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2016-03-22 12:49:10 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > I've noticed that gpgv.exe fails its CI test (debian/tests/gpgv-win32) in > version 1.4.20-4 (-3 and previous work fine): interesting, there was no change between -3 and -4 other than re-adding the gpgv-udeb for constrained armel