On Tue 2016-04-05 02:23:59 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> gpgv-win32 from unstable seems to work for me now (using the
> debian/tests/gpgv-win32 test at least).
good!
> The CI test still fails though, you might want to try integrating
> Antonio's proposal below.
it should already
Hi Daniel,
gpgv-win32 from unstable seems to work for me now (using the
debian/tests/gpgv-win32 test at least).
The CI test still fails though, you might want to try integrating
Antonio's proposal below.
Le jeudi, 24 mars 2016, 14.41:54 Antonio Terceiro a écrit :
> the caveat in this case is
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 03:07:01PM +0100, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Le mercredi, 23 mars 2016, 23.14:59 Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit :
> > On Tue 2016-03-22 12:49:10 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > > (By the way, the CI seems to have never run successfully in the last
> > > months:
Le mercredi, 23 mars 2016, 23.14:59 Daniel Kahn Gillmor a écrit :
> On Tue 2016-03-22 12:49:10 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> > I've noticed that gpgv.exe fails its CI test
> > (debian/tests/gpgv-win32) in version 1.4.20-4 (-3 and previous work
> > fine):
>
> interesting, there was no
On Tue 2016-03-22 12:49:10 -0400, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> I've noticed that gpgv.exe fails its CI test (debian/tests/gpgv-win32) in
> version 1.4.20-4 (-3 and previous work fine):
interesting, there was no change between -3 and -4 other than re-adding
the gpgv-udeb for constrained armel
5 matches
Mail list logo