On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > > Any comments to convince me to reconsider closing this as wontfix?
> >
> > All I can add is that I have no preference for which way (old/new) that
> > loop nodes are represented in the filesystem, but that, for control in
>
Hello Zenaan Harkness.
Thanks for quick followup
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 12:33:10AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 12:38:01PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > > FWIW, I think it is much tidier to have all loop devices in a sub
> > > directory of /dev/ , but my persona
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 12:38:01PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > FWIW, I think it is much tidier to have all loop devices in a sub
> > directory of /dev/ , but my personal scripts need their own directory
> > anyway, and I think that /dev/loop/ should contain all "default" /
> > "auto genera
Hello Zenaan Harkness.
Thanks for your bug report.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 01:03:50PM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Package: mount
> Version: 2.25.2-6
> Severity: normal
> File: /sbin/losetup
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Not sure if this is upstream.
>
> BUG: losetup fails to list loop devices i
Package: mount
Version: 2.25.2-6
Severity: normal
File: /sbin/losetup
Dear Maintainer,
Not sure if this is upstream.
BUG: losetup fails to list loop devices in use
when /dev/loop directory exists.
I thought the /dev/loop-control file was all that was needed by
losetup, but perhaps not - it's be
5 matches
Mail list logo
