Bug#819664: .sign suffix?

2016-09-26 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hallo, * Steve McIntyre [Mon, Sep 26 2016, 03:14:21PM]: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:10:37AM +0200, Stéphane Blondon wrote: > >Hello, > > > >Le 25/09/2016 à 17:57, Eduard Bloch a écrit : > >> I am slightly wondering about this new filename ending .sign. IMHO the > >> usual pattern for such files

Bug#819664: .sign suffix?

2016-09-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 09:10:37AM +0200, Stéphane Blondon wrote: >Hello, > >Le 25/09/2016 à 17:57, Eduard Bloch a écrit : >> I am slightly wondering about this new filename ending .sign. IMHO the >> usual pattern for such files was .gpg before (for example: Release.gpg). >> >> This .sign looks

Bug#819664: .sign suffix?

2016-09-26 Thread Stéphane Blondon
Hello, Le 25/09/2016 à 17:57, Eduard Bloch a écrit : > I am slightly wondering about this new filename ending .sign. IMHO the > usual pattern for such files was .gpg before (for example: Release.gpg). > > This .sign looks weird, it does not tell you which format the data > inside might have.

Bug#819664: .sign suffix?

2016-09-25 Thread Eduard Bloch
Hello, I am slightly wondering about this new filename ending .sign. IMHO the usual pattern for such files was .gpg before (for example: Release.gpg). This .sign looks weird, it does not tell you which format the data inside might have. Please reconsider the filenames. Regards, Eduard.