Bug#819854: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#819854: wouldn't Recommends: be better?

[adding dbconfig maintainer] On Monday 04 April 2016 01:39 PM, Axel Beckert wrote: > dbconfig is something Debian-specific and used by _many_ packages and > there are probably very little users who don't want that and are > capable of managing this. > > The fact that gitlab uses letsencrypt

Bug#819854: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#819854: wouldn't Recommends: be better?

Hi, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 2016, ഏപ്രിൽ 4 3:55:41 AM IST, Axel Beckert wrote: > >> > we can make letsencrypt optional. > > > > Huh? Now that's a strange request. > > How is it strange? How is it not different from dbconfig-no-thanks? dbconfig is something Debian-specific

Bug#819854: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#819854: wouldn't Recommends: be better?

On 2016, ഏപ്രിൽ 4 3:55:41 AM IST, Axel Beckert wrote: >> > we can make letsencrypt optional. > >Huh? Now that's a strange request. How is it strange? How is it not different from dbconfig-no-thanks? To me it solves the same problem. dbconfig does database configuration, and

Bug#819854: [Letsencrypt-devel] Bug#819854: wouldn't Recommends: be better?

Control: reassign -1 gitlab Control: retitle -1 gitlab: Please downgrade hard dependency on letsencrypt to Recommends Hi, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Please provide a letsencrypt-no-thanks package like dbconfig-no-thanks so > > we can make letsencrypt optional. Huh? Now that's a strange request.