On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:55:16 +0100
Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Victory is right
no, i misinterpreted validate as tidy :p
what the patch does:
if both of
(charset is "utf-8")
and
([the last 56 chars of a error] is
"is not a character number in the document character set\n")
Hi again.
I think my conclusion is silly, I was considering encoding the whole string
only.
But we can encode the &000130 and leave the emoji in numeric entity.
Victory is right, I'll try to think clearer later and merge the patch today.
(Now afk, sorry).
El 14 de enero de 2017 13:43:24 CET,
Hi
El 13/01/17 a las 11:34, victory escribió:
>
> first, it is stupid to blame about names which are valid.
> it is also stupid that taking care of each occurrences coming up.
> as pages are all utf-8 now, no need to keep such references,
> this patch restores original characters instead of
first, it is stupid to blame about names which are valid.
it is also stupid that taking care of each occurrences coming up.
as pages are all utf-8 now, no need to keep such references,
this patch restores original characters instead of numeric references
patch below:
Index:
4 matches
Mail list logo
