Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

hi On 2/9/19 7:25 PM, Birger Schacht wrote: >>> There are new lintian warnings: >>> >>> I: sway: file-references-package-build-path usr/bin/sway >>> [...] >>> I think this refers to the occurrence of strings like: >>> ../sway/commands/exec.c >>> in the binaries. This is a relative path and the

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc2

Hello Birger, On Tue 12 Feb 2019 at 07:56PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > I've now removed the sed line alltogether- I didn't find a solution > without adding a patch that would have to be updated with every release. > Maybe there is a way to override the project_version with meson command > line

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc2

Hi, On 2/12/19 6:40 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Birger, > > On Mon 11 Feb 2019 at 07:36PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > >> sway 1.0-rc2 was released today, i've updated the package and pushed to >> salsa. >> >> Changes: >> * New upstream version >> * d/rules: use sed to set upstream

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc2

Hello Birger, On Mon 11 Feb 2019 at 07:36PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > sway 1.0-rc2 was released today, i've updated the package and pushed to > salsa. > > Changes: > * New upstream version > * d/rules: use sed to set upstream version in meson.build It looks like the clean target does not

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc2

Hi, sway 1.0-rc2 was released today, i've updated the package and pushed to salsa. Changes: * New upstream version * d/rules: use sed to set upstream version in meson.build cheers, Birger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hello, On Sun 10 Feb 2019 at 09:51AM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > On 2/9/19 9:21 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: >> Birger, could you add a comment in d/control, saying that the versioned >> dependency is just a workaround to help users of Debian experimental >> avoid a broken window manager, and in the

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 05:15:02PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I don't think we should allow problems with wlroots in experimental to > block getting sway through NEW and into experimental, although we'd want > to hold off moving sway to unstable until the wlroots situation is > resolved. So, I

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hi, On 2/9/19 10:12 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 09:30:43PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >> I'm thinking, it means 0.3-1 broke over 0.2-1, and that is a bug that >> I'd be filing as serious if I found it myself. >> Happy to properly check, since this is a simple library I

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hi, On 2/9/19 9:21 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Birger, could you add a comment in d/control, saying that the versioned > dependency is just a workaround to help users of Debian experimental > avoid a broken window manager, and in the future it will be removed in > favour of relying on

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hello Berger, Mattia, On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 09:30PM +01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >> wlroots is only in experimental and is pre-1.0, however. So we probably >> shouldn't demand proper transitions from its maintainers. > > This is not

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 09:30:43PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > I'm thinking, it means 0.3-1 broke over 0.2-1, and that is a bug that > I'd be filing as serious if I found it myself. > Happy to properly check, since this is a simple library I should find > the time for this. Looking, this

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hi, On 2/9/19 8:55 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Birger, > > On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 07:25PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > * Make versioned run dependency on libwlroots0 explicit >>> >>> Please explain (either in the changelog or with a comment in d/control) >>> why this is needed -- it's

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:21:36PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > wlroots is only in experimental and is pre-1.0, however. So we probably > shouldn't demand proper transitions from its maintainers. This is not about transitions though. It's about being sure wlroots maintainer know what it means

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hello, On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 09:07PM +01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Then it's a bug in libwlroots, that did not bump shlibs when adding > symbols, or it has a broken .symbols file. > And it's a quite serious one at that, if it's really that, showcasing > why maintaining shared libraries is not an

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 12:55:50PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Birger, > > On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 07:25PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > > >>> * Make versioned run dependency on libwlroots0 explicit > >> > >> Please explain (either in the changelog or with a comment in d/control) > >> why

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hello Birger, On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 07:25PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: >>> * Make versioned run dependency on libwlroots0 explicit >> >> Please explain (either in the changelog or with a comment in d/control) >> why this is needed -- it's unusual not to be able to rely on >> dpkg-shlibdeps

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hi, thanks for the detailed review, that was very helpful! On 2/9/19 6:50 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: >> Changes since beta2: >> * New upstream release >> * Remove swaylock and swayidle: they are now separate packages >> * Clean up d/sway.install > > "Cleaning up" suggests only deleting

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hello Birger, On Sat 09 Feb 2019 at 01:42PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > i've updated the package to 1.0-rc1 and pushed to the git repo. Thank you for working on this! For my own reference: this e-mail reviews edcdf846db12a6dc7495caea02bad2faa30586fb. > Changes since beta2: > * New

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

hi, On 2/6/19 1:09 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Birger, > > There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock > into separate source packages. > > Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to > prepare separate source packages for all these? We

Bug#821397: Fwd: sway 1.0-rc1

Hi, On 2/7/19 5:36 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Birger, > > On Wed 06 Feb 2019 at 12:00PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > >> Forgot to cc the bugreport: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote: >>> But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start >>> with

Bug#821397: Fwd: sway 1.0-rc1

Hello Birger, On Wed 06 Feb 2019 at 12:00PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > Forgot to cc the bugreport: > > Hi, > > On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote: >> But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start >> with those. > > thats now #921496 and #921497. You need to set

Bug#821397: Fwd: sway 1.0-rc1

Forgot to cc the bugreport: Hi, On 2/6/19 7:41 AM, Birger Schacht wrote: > But both swayidle and swaylock don't depend on wlroots, so i can start > with those. thats now #921496 and #921497. cheers, Birger signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hi! On 2/6/19 1:11 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 05:09PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock >> into separate source packages. >> >> Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hello, On Tue 05 Feb 2019 at 05:09PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock > into separate source packages. > > Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to > prepare separate source packages for all these? We

Bug#821397: sway 1.0-rc1

Hello Birger, There is a new release of sway out, and it moves swayidle and swaylock into separate source packages. Those are all going to have to pass through NEW. Do you have time to prepare separate source packages for all these? We might as well do it now rather than later. -- Sean

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

control: tag -1 +pending Hello, On Thu 31 Jan 2019 at 01:03PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: >> Could you `dch "Try upload again."; dch -r; git commit; git push`, >> please? Then I can try again with a -3 upload. > done! Success! Thank you for your patience. You should be able to see the result

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Hi, On 1/31/19 4:22 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: tag -1 -pending > > Hello Birger, > > On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 04:44PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> Pushed to DELAYED/14! > > *sigh* > > I have been fighting with Debian's upload queue for the past few hours > because I discovered that the

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

control: tag -1 -pending Hello Birger, On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 04:44PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > Pushed to DELAYED/14! *sigh* I have been fighting with Debian's upload queue for the past few hours because I discovered that the -2 upload was not processed. I was able to get it processed

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

control: tag -1 +pending Hello Birger, On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 11:31PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > Argl, I'm sorry for having overlooked this Well, me too :) >> Could you make this change as a -2 upload, please? Since I have already >> pushed the -1, it is cleaner to do it that way. > Yes,

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Hi, On 1/30/19 10:46 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > control: tag -1 -pending > > Hello, > > On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 02:42PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> Thank you. I've pushed it to DELAYED/14, after which it will land in >> the NEW queue. > > Er. After doing this, I immediately discovered this

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

control: tag -1 -pending Hello, On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 02:42PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > Thank you. I've pushed it to DELAYED/14, after which it will land in > the NEW queue. Er. After doing this, I immediately discovered this error in d/copyright: License: LGPL-2.1-or-later should be

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

control: tag -1 +pending Hello Birger, On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 09:13PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > done in 0d9ddb3b ;) Thank you. I've pushed it to DELAYED/14, after which it will land in the NEW queue. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Hello Birger, On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 08:47PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > both fixed in ae7be33f. Thanks for your patience! You need dch -r again ... sorry for the bureaucracy. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Hi Sean, On 1/30/19 9:10 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Birger, > > On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 08:47PM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > >> both fixed in ae7be33f. Thanks for your patience! > > You need dch -r again ... sorry for the bureaucracy. > done in 0d9ddb3b ;) cheers, Birger

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Hello Sean, On 1/30/19 8:24 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Birger, > > On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 07:24AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> Thanks. I neglected to do a d/copyright check yesterday and have found >> some problems with d/copyright that need to be fixed before I can >> upload: >> >> - the

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Hello Birger, On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 07:24AM -07, Sean Whitton wrote: > Thanks. I neglected to do a d/copyright check yesterday and have found > some problems with d/copyright that need to be fixed before I can > upload: > > - the Source: field is wrong > > - the protocols/ dir needs accounting

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Hello Birger, On Wed 30 Jan 2019 at 12:07PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote: >> Firstly, I want to ensure that Nicolas is adequately credited for having >> done the majority of the packaging work (so far as I can tell); at the >> time of writing, where master is at 9303b617, I don't think this is >>

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Hi, On 1/30/19 2:33 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > Dear Birger, Nicolas, > > On Fri 11 Jan 2019 at 08:19AM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > >> I've sent nicoo another mail about this and i'll let you know as soon as >> i hear back. > > Thank you to both of you for your recent work on the sway package.

Bug#821397: intent to sponsor an upload to NEW

Dear Birger, Nicolas, On Fri 11 Jan 2019 at 08:19AM +01, Birger Schacht wrote: > I've sent nicoo another mail about this and i'll let you know as soon as > i hear back. Thank you to both of you for your recent work on the sway package. I want to unblock inclusion of swaywm in Debian by

Bug#821397: swaywm-team

Hi, I see that there is now a swaywm-team on salsa for sway and wlroots. Are you open to assistance with packaging for sway and associated projects? -- Regards, Scott Leggett. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

Hi, On 1/9/19 1:05 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Michele Cane [2018-12-14 19:32]: >> Thanks for the work already done to bring this package to debian. >> >> Any update of a possible upload of b2 to experimental? > > Yes, please. > > Any update on this? Birger? nicoo? I've sent nicoo

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

* Michele Cane [2018-12-14 19:32]: > Thanks for the work already done to bring this package to debian. > > Any update of a possible upload of b2 to experimental? Yes, please. Any update on this? Birger? nicoo? -- Martin Michlmayr https://www.cyrius.com/

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

Hi folks, Thanks for the work already done to bring this package to debian. Any update of a possible upload of b2 to experimental? Cheers Mike Michele Cane, PhD.

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

hi, On 12/3/18 12:52 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 10:10:33PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote: >> but i'm not a DM so i can not upload it. Should i create an RFS and go >> through mentors? >> (also, i'm still not sure if its oke to just take the package from nicoo) > > Usually

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 10:10:33PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote: > but i'm not a DM so i can not upload it. Should i create an RFS and go > through mentors? > (also, i'm still not sure if its oke to just take the package from nicoo) Usually it's not quite ok, and at the very least it's considered

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

hi, On 12/2/18 5:11 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:05:40PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote: >> just for the record: sway depends on json-c >= 0.13, which is in >> transition (see #904418) > > Regardless of this detail, would you consider uploading it to > experimental

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:05:40PM +0100, Birger Schacht wrote: > just for the record: sway depends on json-c >= 0.13, which is in > transition (see #904418) Regardless of this detail, would you consider uploading it to experimental already, or are there any other blockers? :) -- regards,

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

just for the record: sway depends on json-c >= 0.13, which is in transition (see #904418) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

Hello, On Wed 07 Nov 2018 at 10:13PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Sean, did you see the full email that added the pending tag? > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821397;msg=56 I hadn't. Thank you. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#821397: ITP: sway -- i3-compatible Wayland compositor

Sean, did you see the full email that added the pending tag? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=821397;msg=56 Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#821397: ITP tagged as pending?

Hello Nicolas, Do you recall why you tagged #821397 as pending? AFAICT the package is not in NEW. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#821397: (no subject)

Sway is almost having the 1.0 version released, so I think it's time to consider how to package it.

Bug#821397:

In case it is still the concern of including Sway, in its early development stage, into the Debian Stretch release, holding it back from being packaged, this might no longer be an issue, as Debian Stretch is already in freeze, and it will take a couple more years until the next stable release.

Bug#821397: RFP: sway -- i3-compatible window manager for Wayland

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Oh sorry, that was my fault: I have read ITP (Intend to package) but this unfortunately only a RFP yet. Sorry for the spam, Jan Am 27.12.2016 um 17:52 schrieb Jan Luca Naumann: > Hey, > > it is very nice that someone want to take care of sway for

Bug#821397: RFP: sway -- i3-compatible window manager for Wayland

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hey, it is very nice that someone want to take care of sway for Debian :) What is the current status of the packaging process? Best regards, Jan On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:16:41 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote: > Package: wnpp

Bug#821397: RFP: sway -- i3-compatible window manager for Wayland

On 2016-04-18 3:21 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Not neccessarily: > > At first, sway will be uploaded to "unstable" and unstable is actually quite > very uptodate. After some days and if it's free from bugs of severity > "serious" and higher, it will automatically migrate to "testing". > > So

Bug#821397: RFP: sway -- i3-compatible window manager for Wayland

Hi Drew, On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:03:44AM -0400, Drew DeVault wrote: > Not sure how the Debian process works, so forgive me if I'm > misunderstanding anything. I'm glad you're asking…! :) > My concern is that Debian is slow and sway is <1.0 right now. Will sway > ship with Debian 9 or such

Bug#821397: RFP: sway -- i3-compatible window manager for Wayland

Not sure how the Debian process works, so forgive me if I'm misunderstanding anything. My concern is that Debian is slow and sway is <1.0 right now. Will sway ship with Debian 9 or such and then I'll be receiving bug reports about version 0.* for years? On 2016-04-18 3:16 PM, Holger Levsen

Bug#821397: RFP: sway -- i3-compatible window manager for Wayland

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: sway Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : s...@cmpwn.com * URL : http://swaywm.org/ https://github.com/SirCmpwn/sway * License : BSD Programming Lang: C Description : i3-compatible window