Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-05-16 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 13/05/16 09:46, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:25:01AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> k[...] >>> Go ahead. >> >> Thanks, uploaded. > > Now built everywhere.

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-05-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:25:01AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > k[...] > > Go ahead. > > Thanks, uploaded. Now built everywhere. Could the binNMUs be scheduled? (if you wait for

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-05-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:25:01AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed k[...] > Go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. Regards, Rene

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-05-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 11/05/16 10:17, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:08:04PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > lokalize Needs source fix to find libhunspell-1.4.so(?): filed as

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-05-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:08:04PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > lokalize > > > > > > Needs source fix to find libhunspell-1.4.so(?): filed as #821802 > > > > Still needs fix. > > Fixed now, too. hunspell itself

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-05-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > lokalize > > > > Needs source fix to find libhunspell-1.4.so(?): filed as #821802 > > Still needs fix. Fixed now, too. Regards, Rene

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-05-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
unblock 821772 by 820106 thanks On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:32:05PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 19/04/16 09:27, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hi, > > > >

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-04-19 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 19/04/16 09:27, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > new hunspell upstream release. As the time of this writing it hasn't cleared > NEW, though. Looking good. Let us know once

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-04-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
block 821772 by 820106 block 821772 by 821802 thanks Hi, On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:27:17AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > I have a rebuild test of all those running right now. Most build fine, except: > enchant See before-mentioned bug. > libreoffice See gerrit change. Will be fixed with

Bug#821772: transition: hunspell

2016-04-19 Thread Rene Engelhard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, new hunspell upstream release. As the time of this writing it hasn't cleared NEW, though. Upstream says: --- snip --- I bumped the soname because chunks of the exposed api were