Bug#823548: linux-user-chroot deprecation

On Sun, 15 May 2016 at 20:49:28 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > > May I co-maintain, preferably in collab-maint git? xdg-app (now called > > Flatpak, apparently) is going to depend on it soon; for now it's a git > >

Bug#823548: linux-user-chroot deprecation

Control: owner -1 ! On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 09 May 2016 at 19:01:15 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> I plan to package bubblewrap, then ask for removal of linux-user-chroot. OK, packaged and going to upload it soon. > May I

Bug#823548: linux-user-chroot deprecation

On Mon, 09 May 2016 at 19:01:15 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > I plan to package bubblewrap, then ask for removal of linux-user-chroot. May I co-maintain, preferably in collab-maint git? xdg-app (now called Flatpak, apparently) is going to depend on it soon; for now it's a git

Bug#823548: linux-user-chroot deprecation

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > [added linux-user-chroot maintainer/subscribers to Cc, quoting full text > for their benefit] > > On Mon, 09 May 2016 at 09:13:42 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: >> l-u-c post: >>

Bug#823548: linux-user-chroot deprecation

[added linux-user-chroot maintainer/subscribers to Cc, quoting full text for their benefit] On Mon, 09 May 2016 at 09:13:42 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > l-u-c post: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ostree-list/2016-May/msg0.html > > FWIW if any transition scripts are written I'd be happy to

Bug#823548: linux-user-chroot deprecation

l-u-c post: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/ostree-list/2016-May/msg0.html FWIW if any transition scripts are written I'd be happy to have them in l-u-c upstream. I'm as yet unsure whether it's worth doing so, or pushing for dependent consumers to do a hard port. I'm doing the latter with