Package: maxima-emacs Version: 5.38.0-3 Severity: wishlist I never use maxima-doc (prefer online help); I do not use maxima on my netbook. However, sometimes I print maxima files on my netbook from emacs using M-x ps-print-buffer-with-faces I suspect that maxima-emacs does not need neither maxima nor maxima-doc for its highlighting purposes. Moreover, some people (including myself) prefer to compile maxima manually rather than using Debian package. I find it unjustified that maxima-emacs depends on maxima and maxima-doc. I suggest separating these three packages (like it was in good old times): One should be able to use each of them without installing the other two.
-- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.4.6n (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) Versions of packages maxima-emacs depends on: ii emacs24 [emacsen] 24.5+1-6+b2 ii emacsen-common 2.0.8 ii maxima 5.38.0-3 ii maxima-doc 5.38.0-3 ii tex-common 6.05 ii texlive-binaries [texlive-base-bin] 2015.20160222.37495-1 ii texlive-latex-recommended 2015.20160320-1 Versions of packages maxima-emacs recommends: ii ghostscript [postscript-viewer] 9.19~dfsg-1+b1 ii mime-support 3.59 ii zathura-pdf-poppler [pdf-viewer] 0.2.6-1 ii zathura-ps [postscript-viewer] 0.2.3-1 maxima-emacs suggests no packages. -- debconf-show failed
