On 2016-05-11 21:51, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> Thanks for the update Christian, it will leave all changes up to you guys.
>
> Two more comments:
>
> 1. Please compare the file size with/without binaries.
> 828K libsvm-3.21.tar.gz
> 137K libsvm_3.21+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
Oh, it's definitely on
Thanks for the update Christian, it will leave all changes up to you guys.
Two more comments:
1. Please compare the file size with/without binaries.
828K libsvm-3.21.tar.gz
137K libsvm_3.21+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
2. Please change this to 'all' .
Package: python-libsvm
Architecture: any
On 2016-05-11 17:38, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
> I am preparing a NMU to fix #823880.
Please don't, see my recent mail to #823880.
> Your patch looks good
Yes in general, but most changes are unacceptable within the context of
an NMU.
> and I can integrate it as well as a new python3-libsvm
I am preparing a NMU to fix #823880 .
Your patch looks good, and I can integrate it as well as a new
python3-libsvm package.
Source: libsvm
Version: 3.12-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I would like to have libsvm 3.21 (released on December 14, 2015) if it
was possible. I've already developed a patch to do this, fixing also
some lintian warnings and upgrading the packaging to the latest policy
on the way, that I'm
5 matches
Mail list logo
