Bug#824266: [Python-modules-team] Bug#824266: mkdocs: Please support SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH specification for build time stamps

Axel Beckert writes: > See https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Examples > for some examples on how to implement support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, > including an example for Python. Response from the upstream author (please consider replying to the upstream bug report, not

Bug#824266: [Python-modules-team] Bug#824266: mkdocs: Please support SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH specification for build time stamps

Hi Brian, Brian May wrote: > Axel Beckert writes: > > mkdocs integrates build time stamps into the documentation it is > > generating. This makes at least unburden-home-dir no more reproducibly > > building because it now uses mkdocs to generate HTML documentation at > > build time. > > Is this

Bug#824266: [Python-modules-team] Bug#824266: mkdocs: Please support SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH specification for build time stamps

Axel Beckert writes: > mkdocs integrates build time stamps into the documentation it is > generating. This makes at least unburden-home-dir no more reproducibly > building because it now uses mkdocs to generate HTML documentation at > build time. Is this something that should be forwarded upstre