On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:40:09PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 16-05-23 17:24:12, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 07:00:29PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> > > On 16-05-23 15:43:09, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > > next ambigity: is installation and usage broken, or just inst
On 16-05-23 17:24:12, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 07:00:29PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> > On 16-05-23 15:43:09, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > next ambigity: is installation and usage broken, or just installation?
> > > (IOW: can I disable the apparmor profile for installation
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 07:00:29PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 16-05-23 15:43:09, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > next ambigity: is installation and usage broken, or just installation?
> > (IOW: can I disable the apparmor profile for installation and then
> > reenable it for using it…)
>
> Tested
On 16-05-23 15:43:09, Holger Levsen wrote:
> next ambigity: is installation and usage broken, or just installation?
> (IOW: can I disable the apparmor profile for installation and then
> reenable it for using it…)
Tested both sid and jessie now: Install fails (with aa enabled), but
usage is possib
control: retitle -1 torbrowser still broken with apparmor enabled
control: severity -1 important
control: found -1 0.2.4-1~bpo8+1
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 04:42:03PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> So, to be clear: I've tested the _install_ in sid and jessie, and both are
> broken right now, hence
Holger Levsen wrote (23 May 2016 11:30:33 GMT) :
> btw, it looks like Phil is making nice progress extending the cucumber
> tests from TAILS to Debian, [...]
Woohoo!
> Once these tests work nicely it should be rather straightforward to
> enable apparmor in a VM, install torbrowser-launcher and ru
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 03:14:34PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> Well, not sure what "upgrade" actually means,
>
> no tbl installed -> tbl installed [case 1]
> (AND?) OR
> old tbl installed -> current tbl installed [case 2]
upgrade is #2, #1 is called install :)
and it's not about tbl but tb(
On 16-05-23 11:30:33, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:02:20PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> > Notes:
> >
> > - I proposed this way to test apparmor profiles etc, which doesn't
> > necessarily check for a smooth upgrade path between different
> > versions. If we would like
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:02:20PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> Notes:
>
> - I proposed this way to test apparmor profiles etc, which doesn't
> necessarily check for a smooth upgrade path between different
> versions. If we would like to do this as well, we would indeed have
> to keep c
On 16-05-22 15:45:48, intrigeri wrote:
> Holger Levsen wrote (22 May 2016 12:52:46 GMT) :
> > as I tried to say above: the problem is, an update arrives, and people
> > update their system. After this the update cannot be tested anymore (as
> > people are understandably not really willing to go bac
Holger Levsen wrote (22 May 2016 12:52:46 GMT) :
> as I tried to say above: the problem is, an update arrives, and people
> update their system. After this the update cannot be tested anymore (as
> people are understandably not really willing to go back to a backed up
> state and retest again).
I
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:42:21PM +0200, ge...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 16-05-16 10:57:03, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > one problem debugging this is that this problem occurs only if+when
> > there is a new upstream version of torbrowser to be updated too, which
> > only happens every 6-8 weeks or so.
>
On 16-05-16 10:57:03, Holger Levsen wrote:
> one problem debugging this is that this problem occurs only if+when
> there is a new upstream version of torbrowser to be updated too, which
> only happens every 6-8 weeks or so.
Not sure if I'm missing something obvious here, but: If testing would
happ
Hi,
one problem debugging this is that this problem occurs only if+when
there is a new upstream version of torbrowser to be updated too, which
only happens every 6-8 weeks or so.
It just occured to me that this problem can probably be tested anytime
though, by
- (enabling apparmor)
- launching
14 matches
Mail list logo
