Bug#824779: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#824779: container getty-static.service causes lxcfs high cpu usage

2016-07-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:05:12 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 18.07.2016 um 07:56 schrieb Evgeni Golov: > > Hi again, > > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:30:34AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > wrt SIGPWR: iirc lxc-stop will issue SIGPWR to the container to stop it, > > and this was needed to prop

Bug#824779: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#824779: container getty-static.service causes lxcfs high cpu usage

2016-07-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 18.07.2016 um 09:05 schrieb Evgeni Golov: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 07:56:40AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: >> Hello Michael, Evgeni, >> >> Evgeni Golov [2016-07-18 7:25 +0200]: > There is no point in even wasting four getty processes on tty1-4 in > LXC -- containers are not meant to have

Bug#824779: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#824779: container getty-static.service causes lxcfs high cpu usage

2016-07-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 18.07.2016 um 07:56 schrieb Evgeni Golov: > Hi again, > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:30:34AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> I assume this file was created by lxc. >>> Apparently the lxc maintainers decided it is useful to have a getty on >>> tty1-tty4? lxc maintainers, could you give us some i

Bug#824779: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#824779: container getty-static.service causes lxcfs high cpu usage

2016-07-18 Thread Evgeni Golov
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 07:56:40AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello Michael, Evgeni, > > Evgeni Golov [2016-07-18 7:25 +0200]: > > > > There is no point in even wasting four getty processes on tty1-4 in > > > > LXC -- containers are not meant to have gettys on ttys in the first > > > > place. I

Bug#824779: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#824779: container getty-static.service causes lxcfs high cpu usage

2016-07-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Michael, Evgeni, Evgeni Golov [2016-07-18 7:25 +0200]: > > > There is no point in even wasting four getty processes on tty1-4 in > > > LXC -- containers are not meant to have gettys on ttys in the first > > > place. I committed a fix to git for that. > > > (ConditionVirtualization=!containe

Bug#824779: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#824779: container getty-static.service causes lxcfs high cpu usage

2016-07-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi again, On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:30:34AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > I assume this file was created by lxc. > > Apparently the lxc maintainers decided it is useful to have a getty on > > tty1-tty4? lxc maintainers, could you give us some input here, why > > getty-static.service was not com

Bug#824779: [pkg-lxc-devel] Bug#824779: container getty-static.service causes lxcfs high cpu usage

2016-07-17 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi Michael, On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:17:27AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 16.07.2016 um 15:34 schrieb Martin Pitt: > > Control: tag -1 pending > > > > Wang Jian [2016-05-19 23:59 +0800]: > >> getty-static.service starts getty on tty2-6, but container has only 4 > >> ttys (1-4) at default. g