Bug#825110: yaboot vs grub: metadata_csum and 64bit ext4

2016-05-31 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 02:07:31PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > I understand your point for ppc64el, but since `yaboot` gets build on > ppc64, some users may break their systems... According to buildd, it fails to build on ppc64 (not surprising since it requires 32bit static libraries to link

Bug#825110: yaboot vs grub: metadata_csum and 64bit ext4

2016-05-31 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi Milan, On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote: > On 05/31/2016 04:35 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> Here is the short explanation on why I played with the `pending` tag. >> , >> Switching from yaboot to grub for d-i is a great news. However I >> feared two things, with the curr

Bug#825110: yaboot vs grub: metadata_csum and 64bit ext4

2016-05-31 Thread Milan Kupcevic
tags 825110 + pending unblock 825110 by 610206 thanks On 05/31/2016 04:35 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Here is the short explanation on why I played with the `pending` tag. > , > Switching from yaboot to grub for d-i is a great news. However I > feared two things, with the current applied patch

Bug#825110: yaboot vs grub: metadata_csum and 64bit ext4

2016-05-31 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Here is the short explanation on why I played with the `pending` tag. , Switching from yaboot to grub for d-i is a great news. However I feared two things, with the current applied patch for #825110 we are currently restricting users solely for yaboot user (I did not understand why the switch was d