Hi,
On 26/07/16 06:39, YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote:
After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running),
>>>
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>> After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running),
>>
>> mips is finally catching up.
>>
>>> We still have
On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote:
>> After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running),
>
> mips is finally catching up.
>
>> We still have these package having problem:
>
>> geoclue: give up
>> libhtp: give up
>
> Not sure
On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote:
> After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running),
mips is finally catching up.
> We still have these package having problem:
> geoclue: give up
> libhtp: give up
Not sure what you mean by "give up". Did you see my question in the previous
After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running),
We still have these package having problem:
adasockets: build-dep problem
apq: build-dep problem
dbusada: build-dep problem
dico: ftbfs
dlz-ldap-enum: ftbfs
gccxml: still building with gcc-4.9
geoclue: give up
libalog: ftbfs
On 01/06/16 11:27, YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> On 28/05/16 14:31, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>> Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9.
>>
>> Is gcc-snapshot needed?
>
> It is not needed. Sorry forget to exclude
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/05/16 14:31, YunQiang Su wrote:
>> Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9.
>
> Is gcc-snapshot needed?
It is not needed. Sorry forget to exclude it.
>
> BTW are these the ones with affected static
On 28/05/16 14:31, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9.
Is gcc-snapshot needed?
BTW are these the ones with affected static libraries, or all of them? Per your
email, we should do the packages with static libraries first, and only then do
the rest, IIUC.
If
Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9.
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 8:29 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
>> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> usertags 825342 binnmu
>> thanks
>>
>>
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertags 825342 binnmu
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> On 26/05/16 11:48, YunQiang Su wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>>
>> Background:
>> 1. About FPXX:[1]
>> The o32
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 825342 binnmu
thanks
Hi,
On 26/05/16 11:48, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
>
> Background:
> 1. About FPXX:[1]
> The o32 ABI has been modified and extended. The o32 64-bit
> floating-point register support is now
Package: release.debian.org
Background:
1. About FPXX:[1]
The o32 ABI has been modified and extended. The o32 64-bit
floating-point register support is now obsolete and has been removed.
It has been replaced by three ABI extensions FPXX, FP64A, and FP64.
The meaning of the -mfp64 command-line
12 matches
Mail list logo