Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-11-22 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On 26/07/16 06:39, YunQiang Su wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote: After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running), >>>

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-07-25 Thread YunQiang Su
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote: >>> After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running), >> >> mips is finally catching up. >> >>> We still have

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-07-23 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/06/16 21:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote: >> After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running), > > mips is finally catching up. > >> We still have these package having problem: > >> geoclue: give up >> libhtp: give up > > Not sure

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-06-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 07/06/16 19:38, YunQiang Su wrote: > After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running), mips is finally catching up. > We still have these package having problem: > geoclue: give up > libhtp: give up Not sure what you mean by "give up". Did you see my question in the previous

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-06-07 Thread YunQiang Su
After the 1st step of binNMU of mipsel (mips is still running), We still have these package having problem: adasockets: build-dep problem apq: build-dep problem dbusada: build-dep problem dico: ftbfs dlz-ldap-enum: ftbfs gccxml: still building with gcc-4.9 geoclue: give up libalog: ftbfs

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-06-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/06/16 11:27, YunQiang Su wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 28/05/16 14:31, YunQiang Su wrote: >>> Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9. >> >> Is gcc-snapshot needed? > > It is not needed. Sorry forget to exclude

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-06-01 Thread YunQiang Su
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 28/05/16 14:31, YunQiang Su wrote: >> Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9. > > Is gcc-snapshot needed? It is not needed. Sorry forget to exclude it. > > BTW are these the ones with affected static

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-06-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 28/05/16 14:31, YunQiang Su wrote: > Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9. Is gcc-snapshot needed? BTW are these the ones with affected static libraries, or all of them? Per your email, we should do the packages with static libraries first, and only then do the rest, IIUC. If

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-05-28 Thread YunQiang Su
Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9. On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 8:29 PM, YunQiang Su wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> user release.debian@packages.debian.org >> usertags 825342 binnmu >> thanks >> >>

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-05-28 Thread YunQiang Su
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org > usertags 825342 binnmu > thanks > > Hi, > > On 26/05/16 11:48, YunQiang Su wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> >> Background: >> 1. About FPXX:[1] >> The o32

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-05-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 825342 binnmu thanks Hi, On 26/05/16 11:48, YunQiang Su wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > > Background: > 1. About FPXX:[1] > The o32 ABI has been modified and extended. The o32 64-bit > floating-point register support is now

Bug#825342: mips/mipsel: make sure all packages built with fpxx enabled

2016-05-26 Thread YunQiang Su
Package: release.debian.org Background: 1. About FPXX:[1] The o32 ABI has been modified and extended. The o32 64-bit floating-point register support is now obsolete and has been removed. It has been replaced by three ABI extensions FPXX, FP64A, and FP64. The meaning of the -mfp64 command-line