> it appears that it's time for me to let the runit package go, so, hereby
> my acknowledgement to you to adopt the Debian runit package as new
> maintainer. I'm positively surprised that after all these years
> somebody still is motivated to bring runit integration into Debian
> forward. It wou
Hi Dmitry,
it appears that it's time for me to let the runit package go, so, hereby
my acknowledgement to you to adopt the Debian runit package as new
maintainer. I'm positively surprised that after all these years
somebody still is motivated to bring runit integration into Debian
forward. It wo
> I've been there, done that. Many years ago, if interested search
> history for the runit-init package. Today I don't think runit is the
> right choice for integrating as init system into Debian.
Would you be so kind to be more verbose/provide link? What is wrong for
runit provide init?
> Tak
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:36:23AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:18:04PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > > > + * New maintainer
> > > > did Gerrit asked for help?
> > > > stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package.
> > > > (well, Gerrit was fine on g
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:18:04PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > > + * New maintainer
> > > did Gerrit asked for help?
> > > stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package.
> > > (well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC)
> >
> > Gerrit gave up fgetty (which I picked u
control: noowner -1
Hi,
>actually I'm not okay with anyone taking over the runit packge. And I
>don't see why runit needs an update in Debian. The few bugs are known
>and can be worked around if necessary.
well, updating the packaging is something I generally like a lot, it makes
easier to
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:18:04PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > + * New maintainer
> > did Gerrit asked for help?
> > stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package.
> > (well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC)
>
> Gerrit gave up fgetty (which I picked up), so I think
> + * New maintainer
> did Gerrit asked for help?
> stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package.
> (well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC)
Gerrit gave up fgetty (which I picked up), so I think he will be okay
with this. But explicit is better then implicit.
> compat
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit"
lets see
1)
+ * New maintainer
did Gerrit asked for help?
stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package.
(well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC)
2)
compat level 10 not
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit"
* Package name: runit
Version : 2.1.2-4
Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape
* Url : http://smarden.org/runit/
* Licenses: BSD-3-clause
Section
10 matches
Mail list logo