Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-07-15 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> it appears that it's time for me to let the runit package go, so, hereby > my acknowledgement to you to adopt the Debian runit package as new > maintainer. I'm positively surprised that after all these years > somebody still is motivated to bring runit integration into Debian > forward. It wou

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-23 Thread Gerrit Pape
Hi Dmitry, it appears that it's time for me to let the runit package go, so, hereby my acknowledgement to you to adopt the Debian runit package as new maintainer. I'm positively surprised that after all these years somebody still is motivated to bring runit integration into Debian forward. It wo

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-19 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> I've been there, done that. Many years ago, if interested search > history for the runit-init package. Today I don't think runit is the > right choice for integrating as init system into Debian. Would you be so kind to be more verbose/provide link? What is wrong for runit provide init? > Tak

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-17 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:36:23AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:18:04PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > > + * New maintainer > > > > did Gerrit asked for help? > > > > stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package. > > > > (well, Gerrit was fine on g

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-16 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:18:04PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > + * New maintainer > > > did Gerrit asked for help? > > > stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package. > > > (well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC) > > > > Gerrit gave up fgetty (which I picked u

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: noowner -1 Hi, >actually I'm not okay with anyone taking over the runit packge. And I >don't see why runit needs an update in Debian. The few bugs are known >and can be worked around if necessary. well, updating the packaging is something I generally like a lot, it makes easier to

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-16 Thread Gerrit Pape
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:18:04PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > + * New maintainer > > did Gerrit asked for help? > > stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package. > > (well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC) > > Gerrit gave up fgetty (which I picked up), so I think

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-13 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
> + * New maintainer > did Gerrit asked for help? > stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package. > (well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC) Gerrit gave up fgetty (which I picked up), so I think he will be okay with this. But explicit is better then implicit. > compat

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit" lets see 1) + * New maintainer did Gerrit asked for help? stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package. (well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC) 2) compat level 10 not

Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP

2016-06-11 Thread Dmitry Bogatov
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit" * Package name: runit Version : 2.1.2-4 Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape * Url : http://smarden.org/runit/ * Licenses: BSD-3-clause Section