Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-03 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Control: severity -1 important bacula 7.4.4+dfsg-3 switched to using libssl1.0-dev, so the release critical severity no longer applies.

Bug#828244: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-10-27 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Control: tag -1 + help > There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent > snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. > > If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. As adapting openssl-related code is not my

Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-10-17 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Kurt Roeckx writes: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:56:34AM +0200, Carsten Leonhardt wrote: >> Is the plan still to have OpenSSL 1.1 in stretch? There were several >> concerns raised in the thread following your announcement in June. > > Yes it is. I don't really know of any raised

Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-10-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 10:56:34AM +0200, Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: > >

Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-10-14 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Hi Kurt, > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/bacula_7.4.0+dfsg-1_amd64-20160529-1407 [...] > If you have problems

Bug#828244: bacula: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: bacula Version: 7.4.0+dfsg-1 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: