On 2016-09-12 17:15:15 [+0200], Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Many thanks, so let's just try it :-)
>
> It FTBFS on the non-linux architectures:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sendmail=unstable
>
> It's this part of your patch:
Sorry for that. V2 attached. I could throw on a
On 2016-09-12 09:02, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> could you please try if the patch attached works? It compiles :)
Many thanks, so let's just try it :-)
It FTBFS on the non-linux architectures:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sendmail=unstable
It's this part of your patch:
control: tags -1 patch
On 2016-07-01 01:47:09 [+0200], Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> maybe you can help me getting sendmail (which I'm QA maintaining for
> some years now) to work with the new openssl.
…
> Dear users of sendmail: Your help is needed in case you want to
> continue using sendmail in
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 01:47:09AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
> Since I'm used to neither openssl nor the sendmail source code (and I
> have no use for sendmail at all, now that it passes the piuparts
> tests), I'm not going to write a patch for supporting openssl 1.1.0
> along 1.0.2.
>
Control: tag -1 help
Hi Kurt,
maybe you can help me getting sendmail (which I'm QA maintaining for
some years now) to work with the new openssl.
On 2016-06-26 12:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/sendmail_8.15.2-4_amd64-20160529-1535
> If
Source: sendmail
Version: 8.15.2-4
Severity: important
Control: block 827061 by -1
Hi,
OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using
OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:
6 matches
Mail list logo
