Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Hello, there are plans but no schedule for a stable version 2 release. Do not rely on it. A new version 1 reelase with important bug fixes (but not security related) is intended within the next few weeks. Please find attached the patch for OpenSSL 1.1 for Socat 1.7.3.1, modified again...

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Hi, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Gerhard Rieger wrote: > find attached the adapted patch to socat-2.0.0-b9. Please check if it > works for you! Any plans for a stable tagged 2.0.0 release? I still have 1.7.3.1 for the next stable Debian release with the adopted

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Hello, find attached the adapted patch to socat-2.0.0-b9. Please check if it works for you! Regards Gerhard Am 19.11.2016 um 15:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): > Hi Gerhard, > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Gerhard Rieger > wrote: >> sorry for not replying

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Hi Gerhard, On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Gerhard Rieger wrote: > sorry for not replying so long, this was due to private issues I have. > I intend to test for the new functions in autoconf and have the > preprocessor conditionals check for these results instead of >

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Hello, sorry for not replying so long, this was due to private issues I have. I intend to test for the new functions in autoconf and have the preprocessor conditionals check for these results instead of OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER. Regards Gerhard Am 03.11.2016 um 22:38 schrieb Sandro Tosi: > On

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 3:59 PM, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:53:05 +0200 Gerhard Rieger >> wrote: >>> Thank you, I will check! >> >> hey Gerhard, do you

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:53:05 +0200 Gerhard Rieger > wrote: >> Thank you, I will check! > > hey Gerhard, do you have a plan to look at this soon (now that openssl > 1.1.0 bugs are RC)? thanks!

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:53:05 +0200 Gerhard Rieger wrote: > Thank you, I will check! hey Gerhard, do you have a plan to look at this soon (now that openssl 1.1.0 bugs are RC)? thanks!

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Thank you, I will check! Rergards Gerhard Am 29.08.2016 um 21:37 schrieb Sebastian Andrzej Siewior: > control: tags -1 patch > > On 2016-06-26 12:24:09 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> Source: socat >> Version: 1.7.3.1-1 >> >> OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

control: tags -1 patch On 2016-06-26 12:24:09 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Source: socat > Version: 1.7.3.1-1 > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: >

Bug#828550: socat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Source: socat Version: 1.7.3.1-1 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: