Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
block 828618 by 828462 thanks On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: > > I don't mind. I guess blocks might be better, to remind me to test it > when the ocaml-ssl bug is fixed. So I've set that.

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 26 June 2016 at 13:15, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: >> On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using >> >

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:20:33PM +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote: > On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Hi, > > > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Thomas Leonard
On 26 June 2016 at 11:24, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Hi, > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: >

Bug#828618: zeroinstall-injector: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: zeroinstall-injector Version: 2.10-2 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: