Bug#831153: Fix for the openjdk-8-jre-dcevm FTBFS

2016-10-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 12:49:32PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Thank you very much for the patch Adrian, I confirm it works. I'll > upload a new version soon. > > What is the recommended way to depend on GCC? Should the package depend > on g++ (>= 4:6), or should it depend on gcc-6 with a

Bug#831153: Fix for the openjdk-8-jre-dcevm FTBFS

2016-10-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Thank you very much for the patch Adrian, I confirm it works. I'll upload a new version soon. What is the recommended way to depend on GCC? Should the package depend on g++ (>= 4:6), or should it depend on gcc-6 with a build adjusted to use it? Emmanuel Bourg

Bug#831153: Fix for the openjdk-8-jre-dcevm FTBFS

2016-10-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
Control: tags -1 -help Control: tags -1 +patch There are 5 different issues regarding this FTBFS and attempts to resolve it: 1. Changing the build dependencies doesn't change the compiler. Adding g++-5 resulted in #835956, but when you don't tell the build system of the software to use this