Bug#831962: False positive (?)

2016-07-22 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 10:25:08PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 22/07/16 at 21:34 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > > Source: z3 > > > Version: 4.4.1-0.1 > > > > Hello Lucas. > > > > This package does not generate any "Arch: all" binary

Bug#831962: False positive (?)

2016-07-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/07/16 at 21:34 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Source: z3 > > Version: 4.4.1-0.1 > > Hello Lucas. > > This package does not generate any "Arch: all" binary packages. It does: z3 4.4.1-0.1 built both arch:all and arch:any, see Architecture

Bug#831962: False positive (?)

2016-07-22 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: z3 > Version: 4.4.1-0.1 Hello Lucas. This package does not generate any "Arch: all" binary packages. Why would you want to build it with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"? I wonder if this is a bug at all. Every source package generating only "Arch: