Bug#832192: [Python-modules-team] Bug#832192: celeryd: Section should not be “python”

2016-07-30 Thread Justin B Rye
I'm not a DD, but here I go butting in with an opinion anyway! Brian May wrote: > Ben Finney writes: >> By the section descriptions, this package may belong in section >> “admin”. > > I am not convinced admin is appropriate: > "Utilities to administer system resources, manage user accounts, etc.

Bug#832192: [Python-modules-team] Bug#832192: celeryd: Section should not be “python”

2016-07-25 Thread Brian May
To: Debian-Devel Any ideas what section this package should go into? I don't really care myself, however don't want to move it somewhere and find that I need to move it again. Thanks. Ben Finney writes: > Well, it seems at least a good fit: Celery is a “system resource” as > much as any other

Bug#832192: [Python-modules-team] Bug#832192: celeryd: Section should not be “python”

2016-07-23 Thread Ben Finney
On 24-Jul-2016, Brian May wrote: > I am not convinced admin is appropriate: > "Utilities to administer system resources, manage user accounts, etc." Well, it seems at least a good fit: Celery is a “system resource” as much as any other daemon that provides services to applications behind the scene

Bug#832192: [Python-modules-team] Bug#832192: celeryd: Section should not be “python”

2016-07-23 Thread Brian May
Ben Finney writes: > By the section descriptions, this package may belong in section > “admin”. I am not convinced admin is appropriate: "Utilities to administer system resources, manage user accounts, etc." celeryd isn't a utility for system administrators, it is a deamon used mainly by Python