Gianfranco Costamagna:
>>> "Replaces: apparmor-parser"
>>> I don't know exactly the rationale for it, but I would consider dropping
>>> it,>
>>I'll drop it if/once I'm explained why it's useless :)
> I can't provide an explanation, but the apparmor-parser package is not part
> of Debian
> http:
Hi,
>> "Replaces: apparmor-parser"
>> I don't know exactly the rationale for it, but I would consider dropping it,>
>I'll drop it if/once I'm explained why it's useless :)
I can't provide an explanation, but the apparmor-parser package is not part of
Debian
http://snapshot.debian.org/binary/ap
Gianfranco Costamagna:
> BTW another question:
> "Replaces: apparmor-parser"
> I don't know exactly the rationale for it, but I would consider dropping it,
I'll drop it if/once I'm explained why it's useless :)
cheers,
--
intrigeri
Hi,
>Yeah, let's clean this up eventually! Done in our Vcs-Bzr.
thanks :)
>I've tried to document every change in atomic commits, see bzr log.
>I'd be very happy if you could review it :)
I did, thanks for the very careful review and commits
>Note that I've also checked the Debian upgrade path
Control: tag -1 + pending
Hi Gianfranco,
Gianfranco Costamagna:
> Hi, as explained here [1], Ubuntu needs the breaks+replaces from an LTS to
> another, and
> they can be safely dropped after the new one is out.
> Now, xenial is released, and upgrades from trusty will be done with the
> trusty
source: apparmor
version: 2.10.95-4
severity: wishlist
tags: patch
Hi, as explained here [1], Ubuntu needs the breaks+replaces from an LTS to
another, and
they can be safely dropped after the new one is out.
Now, xenial is released, and upgrades from trusty will be done with the trusty
and xeni
6 matches
Mail list logo
