Bug#833256: util-linux: Please use login/su/... implementations provided by util-linux

Hi Andreas, 2017-01-06 19:49 GMT+01:00 Andreas Henriksson : > Hello Balint Reczey, > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 06:29:21PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:45:40 +0200 Andreas Henriksson >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at

Bug#833256: util-linux: Please use login/su/... implementations provided by util-linux

Hello Balint Reczey, On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 06:29:21PM +0100, Balint Reczey wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:45:40 +0200 Andreas Henriksson > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:01:56AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > ATM, on debian, login,

Bug#833256: util-linux: Please use login/su/... implementations provided by util-linux

Hi, On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:45:40 +0200 Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello Laurent Bigonville. > > Thanks for opening this bug report. I remember we've touched on this > subject inside another bug report but I feel it's useful to have a > separate on-topic discussion about

Bug#833256: util-linux: Please use login/su/... implementations provided by util-linux

Hello Laurent Bigonville. Thanks for opening this bug report. I remember we've touched on this subject inside another bug report but I feel it's useful to have a separate on-topic discussion about this... On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:01:56AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Package: util-linux >

Bug#833256: util-linux: Please use login/su/... implementations provided by util-linux

Package: util-linux Version: 2.28-6 Severity: normal Hi, ATM, on debian, login, su, ... are provided by the shadow package. It seems that all other distribution are using the implementations from util-linux. Shouldn't debian do the same and shouldn't we build the "login" from util-linux? This