Bug#833737: tasksel: s390x should be a server architecture

2016-08-14 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Control: tag -1 pending Christian PERRIER (2016-08-09): > Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org): > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:09:06PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > Please mark s390x as an unlikely desktop architecture, and thus a server > > > one. s390 port is

Bug#833737: tasksel: s390x should be a server architecture

2016-08-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org): > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:09:06PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Please mark s390x as an unlikely desktop architecture, and thus a server > > one. s390 port is already marked as such. > > LGTM. But it seems that tasksel is not part of

Bug#833737: tasksel: s390x should be a server architecture

2016-08-08 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:09:06PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Please mark s390x as an unlikely desktop architecture, and thus a server > one. s390 port is already marked as such. LGTM. But it seems that tasksel is not part of debian-installer's git repositories. |-: Kind regards and

Bug#833737: tasksel: s390x should be a server architecture

2016-08-08 Thread Geert Stappers
Control: tag -1 patch stop Thanks On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:09:06PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > --- a/tests/desktop > +++ b/tests/desktop > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ common_desktop_architecture () { > # this task. > unlikely_desktop_architecture () { > case "$arch" in > -

Bug#833737: tasksel: s390x should be a server architecture

2016-08-08 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Package: tasksel Version: 3.35 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Please mark s390x as an unlikely desktop architecture, and thus a server one. s390 port is already marked as such. >From a152f5a7810f8d618cd6a4289d386fda0a4dc223 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dimitri John Ledkov