Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-23 Thread Tanguy Ortolo
package gajim severity 834399 normal thanks Okay, this is not an issue with GnuPG 2 breaking Gajim, but with Gajim not being able to use GnuPG 2 properly. But then it is not serious, not even important, but normal : main functionnality of Gajim, which is instant messaging, it working fine,

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Werner Koch
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:59, t...@mirbsd.de said: > all agents, and logged in again) since the upgrade. This never was a > problem before, and, considering both gpg and gnupg2 can still use the > running/old agent, looks like it’s still no problem, so the warning is > silly at best. The warning is

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Werner Koch
Hi, some general comments: On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:36, d...@fifthhorseman.net said: > ValueError: Unknown status message: u'KEY_CONSIDERED' Gajim's state machine for the status lines should ignore all status messages it does not know or need. We add new status lines every few releases and it

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Thorsten Glaser
tags 834399 - moreinfo thanks Daniel Kahn Gillmor dixit: >Control: reassign 834399 gajim >Control: retitle 834399 Gajim GnuPG improvements >Control: tags 834399 + moreinfo >Control: affects 834399 + gnupg Please always Cc the maintainers of the package when reassigning, as debbugs does NOT do

Bug#834399: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#834399: Bug#834399: gnupg: gnupg2-bases gpg breaks Gajim

2016-08-18 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: reassign 834399 gajim Control: retitle 834399 Gajim GnuPG improvements Control: tags 834399 + moreinfo Control: affects 834399 + gnupg Hi Thorsten-- Thanks for the report, and for pointing out improvements that need to be made in Gajim's handling of OpenPGP. I'm documenting different