[Santiago Vila]
> So you are basically saying that the conffile mechanism is not good
> for /etc/issue.
Yes. :)
>> If it was not a conffile we could use dpkg-divert to solve this.
>
> I believe conffiles may be dpkg-diverted like any other file which is
> contained inside package.deb.
In
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:04:21PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Santiago Vila]
> > Based on this, my first idea would be to consider this as a bug in
> > unattended-upgrades.
>
> Well, we would like to have a way to avoid the conffile question
> independent of the way packages are
[Santiago Vila]
> Based on this, my first idea would be to consider this as a bug in
> unattended-upgrades.
Well, we would like to have a way to avoid the conffile question
independent of the way packages are upgraded, so adding a workaround in
unattended-upgrades is not really a good solution.
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> But if we modify the content of /etc/issue*, the boxes will be hard to
> upgrade to the next Debian version as the files are conffiles and any
> modification done on the FreedomBox is going to block
> unattended-upgrades from upgrading the system.
Package: base-files
Version: 8
In https://bugs.debian.org/809253 >, the FreedomBox setup have a
usability feature request to include instructions to new users to visit
the web interface and include the IP addresses of the machine to make it
easier for people with console access to connect to the
5 matches
Mail list logo
