Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director

Chris Lamb writes: > Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > >> trying to regenerate [the list] drops the bacula-director and >> bacula-sd-tools packages and adds bacula-director-database. > > Is that incorrect? No, that would be correct. Regards, Carsten

Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director

tags 835120 + pending thanks Fixed in Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=2061f34209ab2659258099b4b2e7ddd27c5cce54 Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director

Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > trying to regenerate [the list] drops the bacula-director and > bacula-sd-tools packages and adds bacula-director-database. Is that incorrect? Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > Is there a reason to not update it during build? (Yes; it downloads stuff from the internet.)

Bug#835120: lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director

retitle 835120 lintian: false positive: virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends for bacula-director thanks Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > So it had nothing to do with experimental as I suspected first. > > Indeed it hasn't at all. Retitling bug to match updated synopsis. :) Regards,