On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:29:37AM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Anyway, as I proposed this mergeback I will see if I can come up with
> the relevant packaging changes now instead of just imagining things.
So, here we go: My proposal in code instead of text (tmp location):
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 09:17:19AM +0100, Tim Retout wrote:
> On 21 August 2016 at 22:36, David Kalnischkies wrote:
> >> So, assuming we can agree on that this is in general a good idea, this
> >> would leave apt-transport-tor relatively empty (expect three symlinks,
>
On 21 August 2016 at 22:36, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>> So, assuming we can agree on that this is in general a good idea, this
>> would leave apt-transport-tor relatively empty (expect three symlinks,
>> a depends on apt and a recommends on -https & tor) but perhaps this
Package: apt-transport-tor
Version: 0.2.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid stretch
X-Debbugs-CC: de...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
as stated earlier this month in:
https://lists.debian.org/deity/2016/08/msg00012.html
I would like to discuss the future of apt-transport-tor, rational:
On Thu, Aug 04,
4 matches
Mail list logo