Bug#835128: Mergeback of apt-transport-tor into apt?

2016-08-28 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:29:37AM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > Anyway, as I proposed this mergeback I will see if I can come up with > the relevant packaging changes now instead of just imagining things. So, here we go: My proposal in code instead of text (tmp location):

Bug#835128: Mergeback of apt-transport-tor into apt?

2016-08-26 Thread David Kalnischkies
Hi, On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 09:17:19AM +0100, Tim Retout wrote: > On 21 August 2016 at 22:36, David Kalnischkies wrote: > >> So, assuming we can agree on that this is in general a good idea, this > >> would leave apt-transport-tor relatively empty (expect three symlinks, >

Bug#835128: Mergeback of apt-transport-tor into apt?

2016-08-25 Thread Tim Retout
On 21 August 2016 at 22:36, David Kalnischkies wrote: >> So, assuming we can agree on that this is in general a good idea, this >> would leave apt-transport-tor relatively empty (expect three symlinks, >> a depends on apt and a recommends on -https & tor) but perhaps this

Bug#835128: Mergeback of apt-transport-tor into apt?

2016-08-22 Thread David Kalnischkies
Package: apt-transport-tor Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: important Tags: sid stretch X-Debbugs-CC: de...@lists.debian.org Hi, as stated earlier this month in: https://lists.debian.org/deity/2016/08/msg00012.html I would like to discuss the future of apt-transport-tor, rational: On Thu, Aug 04,