On Friday, 19 January 2018 11:21:24 AM AEDT Guillem Jover wrote:
> ... but the upstream "packaing" has much to be desired though:
Thanks for analysis, Guillem. Upstream packaging seems to remain as
incompetent as it was when I had a glimpse at it back when I was working on
Grafana packaging...
On 2018-01-19 01:21:24, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 20:09:01 -0500, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
>> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>> > Dmitry said "I'm not sure if I can make it happen as Grafana became
>> > very difficult to package". Well,
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 20:09:01 -0500, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > Dmitry said "I'm not sure if I can make it happen as Grafana became
> > very difficult to package". Well, upstream provides Debian packages so
> > they probably
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 03:33:27PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Dmitry said "I'm not sure if I can make it happen as Grafana became
> very difficult to package". Well, upstream provides Debian packages so
> they probably can be used to unstuck this very old issue.
>
>
Dmitry said "I'm not sure if I can make it happen as Grafana became
very difficult to package". Well, upstream provides Debian packages so
they probably can be used to unstuck this very old issue.
http://docs.grafana.org/installation/debian/#apt-repository
5 matches
Mail list logo
