Control: tags -1 - moreinfo + wontfix
2016-09-01 12:24 Sven Joachim:
If so, the bug might be that aptitude considers any version essential
even if only a non-candidate version is marked as essential.
Note that apt behaves the same way, see #216768. See also the changelog
entry for
- Mail original -
> De: "David Kalnischkies" <da...@kalnischkies.de>
> À: ydir...@free.fr, 836...@bugs.debian.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 1 Septembre 2016 16:20:55
> Objet: Re: [Aptitude-devel] Bug#836265: aptitude: keeps reselecting sysvinit
>
> On Thu, Sep
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:10:14PM +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> > >> I don't see sysvinit being Essential anymore in unstable:
> > >>
> > >> → apt-cache show sysvinit | fgrep -i Essential
> > >> This package depends on init, which is an essential package that
> > >> →
> > >>
> > >> Any chance
- Mail original -
> De: "Sven Joachim" <svenj...@gmx.de>
> À: ydir...@free.fr
> Cc: "Axel Beckert" <a...@debian.org>, 836...@bugs.debian.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 1 Septembre 2016 12:24:59
> Objet: Re: Bug#836265: aptitude: keeps reselectin
On 2016-09-01 11:58 +0200, ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> - Mail original -
>> I don't see sysvinit being Essential anymore in unstable:
>>
>> → apt-cache show sysvinit | fgrep -i Essential
>> This package depends on init, which is an essential package that
>> →
>>
>> Any chance that you
- Mail original -
> I don't see sysvinit being Essential anymore in unstable:
>
> → apt-cache show sysvinit | fgrep -i Essential
> This package depends on init, which is an essential package that
> →
>
> Any chance that you have stable/jessie in your sources.list, too?
Yes: wheezy,
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
ydir...@free.fr wrote:
> The only dependency on it comes from libguestfs0, which depends on
> "systemd | sysvinit", with systemd being already installed,
That is probably irrelevant in your case.
> so it looks like sysvinit has no valid reason to be pulled -
7 matches
Mail list logo
