Bug#836343: mutt: macro interpretation is really fragile

2020-07-06 Thread Samuel Hym
Hi Antonio, > since many things changed in teh most recent version (including the fact that > we are not using neomutt anymore), are you still experiencing this issue in > 1.14.4-2? I’ve just tested using mutt package 1.14.5-1 using the small muttrc from the mail that opened this bug report, the

Bug#836343: mutt: macro interpretation is really fragile

2020-06-21 Thread Antonio Radici
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 09:49:22AM +0200, Samuel Hym wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > Yes, this was happening with mutt/1.6.?. I’ve run into those problems > before mutt/1.7, with mutt packages from unstable. I didn’t try with > older mutts, I wrote those macros only in August.

Bug#836343: mutt: macro interpretation is really fragile

2016-09-02 Thread Samuel Hym
Hi Antonio, Yes, this was happening with mutt/1.6.?. I’ve run into those problems before mutt/1.7, with mutt packages from unstable. I didn’t try with older mutts, I wrote those macros only in August. Best regards

Bug#836343: mutt: macro interpretation is really fragile

2016-09-01 Thread Antonio Radici
Contro: tag -1 +moreinfo On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:50:01PM +0200, Samuel Hym wrote: > Package: mutt > Version: 1.7.0-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > I set up mutt with some heavy macros but I ran into a very dangerous > behaviour: if I define > > macro index '' > > and press i

Bug#836343: mutt: macro interpretation is really fragile

2016-09-01 Thread Samuel Hym
Package: mutt Version: 1.7.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, I set up mutt with some heavy macros but I ran into a very dangerous behaviour: if I define macro index '' and press in index, it doesn't call the postpone-message command (of course, because it is not available in index), but i