Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-10-11 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
Hi Gianfranco, Am 11.10.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: >>> $(LDFLAGS)<-- this should be at the end of the line, not at the begin, >>> otherwise >>> you might see some libraries stripped just because the .o files needing them >>> are put after (this happens when wl-asneeded is

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-10-11 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Klaus > I removed most of the offending content and added the information for the > remaining stuff, namely two files of static sphinx content. wonderful > > 3) > > > > something about: > > cf/um/umread/c-lib/Makefile > > > > CC=gcc > > > > such stuff is a no-go for my personal policy.

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-10-07 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
Hi Guys, one more thing: In a private exchange Ross agreed to me taking over. Thanks Klaus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-10-07 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
Hi Gianfranco, hi Bas, Am 01.10.2016 um 20:35 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: > (additional review, on top of Sebastiaan's one) > * Requires a python version from 2.6 up to, but not including, 3.0. > > Sebastiaan, I'm not sure we can build Python3 version, but I leave this > check to the

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-10-01 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Klaus, >If I misbehaved I apologize. I tried to follow the pertinent Debian >documentation, but that can be a challenge in itself. it is good, just I like the "better safe than sorry" approach :) (additional review, on top of Sebastiaan's one) * Requires a python version from 2.6 up to, but

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-10-01 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 10/01/2016 07:39 PM, Klaus Zimmermann wrote: > Am 30.09.2016 um 14:46 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: >> So, if you can answer the above points and ping back, I'll be happy to do a >> review and maybe an upload. > > Thanks, that would be great! Regarding package review, please also build the

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-10-01 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
Hi Gianfranco, Am 30.09.2016 um 14:46 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: >> Since the package has been moved to the Python Modules team, finding a >> sponsor within the team is your best option. Please contact >> debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org as documented in the Python Modules Team >> policy: >> >

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-30 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 09/30/2016 02:46 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > "the netcdf package. There was an ITP for the netcdf-libcf package, but > development of this source upstream is stalled. > > cf-python depends on netcdf-python being packaged first, and will be > maintained > within the Debian GIS team." >

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 moreinfo control: owner -1 ! > Since the package has been moved to the Python Modules team, finding a > sponsor within the team is your best option. Please contact > debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org as documented in the Python Modules Team > policy: > I'm member of Python Modules

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-26 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 18:15:08 +0200 Klaus Zimmermann wrote: > Mattia already declined sponsoring on grounds of not sponsoring Debian > virgins like myself. Ross Gammon's initial ITP intended to maintain this package in the Debian GIS team alongside the netcdf packages where I'm available for

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

2016-09-19 Thread Klaus Zimmermann
G'day, I incorporated the suggestions by Ben as per my previous email. Also now the test handling has been improved, removing the binary file test_file.nc that was previously packaged. Furthermore, I received some comments from Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri) via irc. In detail: * d/control: ** please